Students’ Perception of Politeness in Communicating with Teachers Through Instant Messaging Application:A Narrative Inquiry

Authors

  • Evi Risky Mularsih University of Muhammadiyah Semarang
  • Ainurvely G Maudy University of Muhammadiyah Semarang

Keywords:

Politeness, communicate, perception

Abstract

This paper aims to determine students' perceptions about etiquette and politeness that must be considered by students when communicating with teachers in an instant messaging application. This study is a qualitative study with a narrative inquiry. The object of research was 8th grade students of Al-Abidin Islamic Middle School Surakarta.The data were collected by interviewing five students from the 8th grade of Al-Abidin Islamic Middle School Surakarta.The results showed that most students already understood the concept of politeness, although it was still simple. Students also understood the reasons why they have to be polite in sending messages to the teachers, although the reasons were more due to age differences.In assessing the contents and the procedures how the way they send massage, the students have already known which one polite or not.

Author Biographies

Evi Risky Mularsih, University of Muhammadiyah Semarang

Faculty of Language and Literature, University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Ainurvely G Maudy, University of Muhammadiyah Semarang

Faculty of Language and Literature, University of Muhammadiyah Surakarta

References

Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1992).Politeness: Some Universal in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Culpeper, J. 2003. Impoliteness revisited: with special reference to dynamic and prosodic aspects. Journal of Pragmatics 35: 1545-1579.

Dhere, J. (2019, December 10). Use of Whatsapp for Educational Purposes.Retrieved from https://jagandhere.wordpress.com/2017/10/16/use-of-whatsapp-for-educational-purposes/.

Escandell, V. (1998).Politeness: A Relevant Issue for Relevance Theory, RevistaAlicantina

deEstudiosIngleses. Madrid: UNED

Fraser, Bruce (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (2): 219_236.

Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City,NY: Anchor Books

Jerald, Greenberg & Robert, A Baron. (1999). BehaviourInOrganisations. New York Mcgraw- Hill

Kitamura, N. (2000). Adapting Brown and Levinson’s ‘Politeness’ Theory to the Analysis of Casual Conversation.Proceeding of ALS2k, the 2000 Conference of the Australian Linguistic Society.

Mills, S. (2003). Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, Gender and Politeness.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Said, N. E. (n. d.).Politeness Strategies in Requests: the Case of Elfhoul Speech Community. AboubakrBelkaid University: Published Dissertation. Retrieved from http://dspace.univ-tlemcen.dz/bitstream/112/3637/1/elhadj-said-nabila.pdf.

Thomas, J. (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.

Wardhaugh, R. (1986). An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Oxford/UK: Blackwell Publisher.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Downloads

Published

2022-10-08

How to Cite

Evi Risky Mularsih, & Ainurvely G Maudy. (2022). Students’ Perception of Politeness in Communicating with Teachers Through Instant Messaging Application:A Narrative Inquiry. Surakarta English and Literature Journal, 3(1), 37–44. Retrieved from https://ejurnal.unsa.ac.id/index.php/selju/article/view/59

Issue

Section

##section.default.title##